- #Tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d manual
- #Tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d skin
- #Tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d full
- #Tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d iso
#Tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d skin
I must admit that I like the so-called "color science" of Canon, and the 6D delivers the usual pleasing skin tones albeit some regular warm cast. Great ColorsĬolor rendition is a very subjective matter, but there seems to be a general thinking that Canon, Nikon, and Fujifilm colors look better straight out of the camera compared to Sony or other brands. Milky way shot taken in the dead of the night at ISO6400 in Puerto Rico. The 6D is the perfect companion for low light photography such as dark events or astrophotography. Each pixel is larger and can gather light more effectively, the image looks sharper, and the dynamic range is acceptable at this price.
#Tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d iso
Excellent Low Light PerformanceĮven by today's standard, the high ISO performance of the 6D is good as the sensor is fitted with only 20 mpx. It produces better bokeh and captures cleaner low light images compared to APS-C or Micro Four Third cameras. If you are in the market for a mid-range camera, I would recommend the 6D over the 80D as it will be more fun to shoot with.
#Tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d full
Personally, I believe that in certain conditions, gears matters and I usually prefer to shoot with a full frame sensor unless I need the extra crop reach or size reduction. The low light sensitivity and bokeh rendering are much better on the 6D compared to the 80D.
Even though the 80D is a good mid-range APS-C option with tilt-screen and Dual Pixel Auto-Focus (DPAF), it remains a "small sensor" camera. Price of a Mid-Range APS-C CameraĪt the moment, the 6D and the APS-C Canon 80D are both available for $999. The Sony a7 suffers from many first-generation problems while the Canon 6D is a mature and effective product. Battery life is poor, the ergonomics don't even come close to the 6D, the JPEG rendering is atrocious, and the camera doesn't output real uncompressed 14 bit raw files. But the a7 has many shortcomings that were mostly corrected by Sony on the following versions. The only two options are the Canon 6D and the Sony a7. You may find cheaper alternatives on the used or refurbished market, but there is always a risk associated with buying items under limited warranty and unknown conditions. There are not many options for brand new full frame cameras under $1,000. The 6D might not be the absolute best performer by today's standard, but it's definitely the best value at this price if you are looking for a full-frame body. But speaking of value, the last Canon 6D boxes still on retailers' shelves are being dropped for almost half of their introduction price. Priced $300 over the competition ( Nikon Z6 and Sony a7 III), it doesn't even deliver in-body image stabilization (IBIS) or decent 4K videos. Some people misunderstood the nature of my criticism I never said that Canon cameras were bad, I merely said they offered poor value. +/-3 levels in single level increments 2, 3, 5 or 7I've been critical of Canon lately as the company tends to deliver overpriced products with underwhelming features. Single, Silent single, Silent continuous, high-speed continuous (6.5 fps), low-speed continuous (3 fps), self-timer 10sec., self-timer 2sec., self-timer continuous
#Tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d manual
One-Shot AF, Predictive AI Servo AF, AI Focus AF, Manual focus They will be updated as soon as possible. Hi-Speed USB, HDMI mini output, Video output (PAL/ NTSC), Headphone mini jackĬertain fields may be left blank. Selectable Blue/Amber bias or Magenta/ Green bias. Single, Continuous L, Continuous H, Self-timer (2s+remote, 10s+remote), Silent single shooting, Silent continuous shootingĬF card type I (UDMA compatible), SD, SDHC, SDXC 2, 3, 5 or 7 Shots +/-3 EV 1/3 or 1/2 stop increments
0 kommentar(er)
